The Positioning — Newsflash #9
- Merv Giam
- Apr 27
- 5 min read
Week 9 | 24 April 2026
eek 5 · 13–20 March 2026
Three portfolios. Same starting positions. Different decisions. Real money logic.
Nine weeks in. All three portfolios above $111,000. All three meaningfully positive. The Benchmark leads for the seventh time in nine weeks — by doing absolutely nothing.
The Scoreboard

The gap between first and last is 51 basis points. Narrow enough that no conclusions should be drawn. Wide enough that the pattern is impossible to ignore.
This was also the week StackMotive launched to the public. On 15 April, the platform went live at real prices. The experiment that has been running in private for nine weeks is now the evidence base for a product that real investors are using. That context matters for everything that follows.

The Strategist dashboard as of 20 April. The full intelligence layer — market regime, macro drivers, central bank signals, dark pool activity, whale positioning — updated continuously. This is what StackMotive surfaces for every investor on the platform.
The Week the Algorithm Led
I was heads-down on the StackMotive launch all week. Product issues, user onboarding, the hundred things that go wrong in the first days after a public release. I looked at the Strategist portfolio twice. I acted on nothing.
The Algorithm had no such distraction. While I was elsewhere, the system executed two trades that the Strategist did not.
On 13 April, with NST sitting at -21.1% and the stop-loss threshold at -18%, the Algorithm exited its entire NST position. Full exit. 212.75 shares at A$23.37. No hesitation, no second-guessing, no waiting to see what the quarterly results would say.
On 17 April, with AMD up +34% from entry and the take-profit rule triggered, the Algorithm trimmed 16.1 shares at $279.44. Partial exit. Profits banked. Position sized back within parameters.
Two clean executions. Both rules-based. Both timestamped in the database. Neither required a human to be paying attention.

The Strategist received the same signals. The NST stop-loss had been sitting at threshold for days, the briefing email flagged it HIGH severity. The AMD take-profit fired on Thursday. I didn’t act on either.
This is not a criticism of the launch. The launch needed to happen. But the data records what happened, and the data says: the platform worked. The human was elsewhere.
The Algorithm now holds $12,494 in cash, proceeds from both exits sitting uninvested. The Strategist holds NST at -19.16% and AMD at full position. The Benchmark holds everything, including a CYL position that has never recovered from its March lows.
NST — The Decision I Haven’t Made
The Algorithm exited NST on 13 April. I didn’t.
NST is currently sitting at -19.16% from my blended average cost. The quarterly results drop 22 April, this Tuesday. The $500 million buyback announced two weeks ago starts around 23 April. Management has stated publicly that they believe the current share price does not reflect the quality of their assets.
I haven’t decided what to do. That’s the honest answer. The launch consumed the week and I haven’t had the mental space to sit with the NST position properly. The thesis, gold miners as a debasement hedge, KCGM expansion on track for FY27 hasn’t changed. But the stop-loss rule exists for a reason, and I dismissed it while the Algorithm executed it.
The quarterly results on Tuesday will either vindicate the hold or make the decision harder. I’ll report in Newsflash #10 whatever happens.

The NST position as it stands. The Algorithm exited at A$23.37 on 13 April. The Strategist is still holding at -19.16%. The quarterly results drop 22 April. The decision is coming.
AMD — When the Take-Profit Fires and You’re Not There
AMD hit +34% from entry this week. The take-profit rule triggered. The Algorithm trimmed 16.1 shares at $279.44 reducing the position to 48.3 shares and banking the gain on the trimmed portion.
The Strategist received the same signal. I didn’t act. AMD is still sitting at 56 shares, full position, now at +34.49% P&L.
Whether that’s a mistake depends on what AMD does next. If it continues to run, the Strategist benefits from holding the larger position. If it pulls back, the Algorithm protected some of the gain and the Strategist didn’t. We won’t know which was correct until we have more data.
What I can say with certainty: the signal fired, the rule was clear, and I wasn’t there to act on it. That’s a real cost of the launch week, and it belongs in the record.

AMD at +34.49% — the take-profit fired and the Algorithm trimmed. The Strategist held the full position. The confluence score has turned mildly bearish since the trim. Whether the hold was right or wrong, the record is clear.
The Launch
StackMotive went live on 15 April. Real prices. Real investors. The platform that has been generating every signal in this experiment for nine weeks is now open to anyone who wants to use it.
Four days in, the first users are finding their feet. Some have already loaded full portfolios. Some are still exploring. The platform is doing what it was built to do surfacing intelligence that retail investors have never had direct access to before.
The experiment that underpins this newsletter is the evidence base for that product. Nine weeks of real signals. Not one fabricated. The NST alerts that fired for seven days before an 18% crash. The TLX allocation breach that triggered two automatic rebalances. The CYL stop-loss that protected the Algorithm while the Benchmark held through the loss. The AMD take-profit this week that fired while I was looking elsewhere.
Every one of those signals is the same intelligence now available to every investor on the platform.

The daily briefing — 13 positions checked, plain language summary, delivered to the inbox every morning. This is what StackMotive looks like in practice. NST flagged HIGH at stop-loss threshold. The signal was there. The decision was mine.
The Nine-Week Arc

Seven of nine weeks led by the passive portfolio. The Strategist led once. The Algorithm led once. The gap at nine weeks: Benchmark leads the Strategist by $508 and the Algorithm by $260.
The thesis is working, all three portfolios are up over 11% from inception. The debasement positioning, the hard asset exposure, the selective tech allocation — it’s performing in the environment it was built for. The question that remains open is whether active management or automated signals can add anything on top of what the thesis alone provides.
Nine weeks of data says: not yet. But the experiment is just getting interesting.
What I’m Watching
NST quarterly results — Tuesday 22 April. This is the moment the holding decision gets made for me one way or another. If the results confirm the operational recovery, I’ll have my answer. If they don’t, I’ll have a different one.
The Algorithm’s $12,494 in cash. The system exited NST and trimmed AMD correctly. That cash will be redeployed when the next signal fires. Whether it catches a better entry than sitting in the position would have provided, that’s the question the next few weeks will answer.
And the new users on the platform, finding their feet, loading portfolios, receiving their first briefings. The experiment that started as a content project has become something else. It’s the evidence base for a product. And the product is live.
The Positioning tracks model portfolios for educational purposes. This is not financial advice. I hold positions in everything discussed here. All figures in USD at current exchange rates. Do your own research.


Comments